Bedrock Sandals vs Shamma Sandals
Two minimalist sandal brands compared on fit, ground feel, durability and best use case. Bedrock Sandals is better for thru-hiking, river crossings, rugged use, while Shamma Sandals is better for race-day sandal running, ultralight performance.
Bedrock Sandals
Montana-made rugged hiking sandal. The thru-hiker's huarache.
Shamma Sandals
Race-bred huaraches. Featherlight construction with some of the best ground feel anywhere.
Specs
| Bedrock Sandals | Shamma Sandals | |
|---|---|---|
| Country | USA | USA |
| Category | Minimalist sandal | Minimalist sandal |
| Drop | 0 mm | 0 mm |
| Toe shape | Open-toe / natural splay | Open-toe / natural splay |
| Best for | Thru-hiking, river crossings, rugged use | Race-day sandal running, ultralight performance |
| Price tier | $$ | $$ |
| Family-tested | Editorial | Editorial |
Winner by category
| Ground feel | Shamma Sandals |
| Toe freedom | Tie |
| Durability | Tie |
| Style | Tie |
| Value | Shamma Sandals |
| Overall | Shamma Sandals |
Which should you buy?
Buy Bedrock Sandals if: You want thru-hiking, river crossings, rugged use from a minimalist sandal brand. Thru-hikers and river runners.
Buy Shamma Sandals if: You want race-day sandal running, ultralight performance from a minimalist sandal brand. Running races in sandals.
Our take
Shamma Sandals edges out overall (8.6 vs 8.2) on the categories above. Bedrock Sandals is still the better pick if you specifically want thru-hiking, river crossings, rugged use. Bottom line: choose Bedrock Sandals for thru-hiking, river crossings, rugged use, choose Shamma Sandals for race-day sandal running, ultralight performance.
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. See our disclosure.
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. See our disclosure.